How we help prevent interference, empower people to vote and more.
How we work with independent fact-checkers, and more, to identify and take action on misinformation.
How we assess content for newsworthiness.
How we reduce problematic content in News Feed.
Quarterly report on how well we're doing at enforcing our policies on the Facebook app and Instagram.
Report on how well we're helping people protect their intellectual property.
Report on government request for people's data.
Report on when we restrict content that's reported to us as violating local law.
Report on intentional internet restrictions that limit people's ability to access the internet.
Quarterly report on what people see on Facebook, including the content that receives the widest distribution during the quarter.
JAN 19, 2022
Ordinarily, when people violate the Facebook Community Standards or Instagram Community Guidelines, they may be restricted from creating content, such as posting, commenting, using Facebook Live or creating a Page. These standard restrictions, which normally range from one-30 days, aim to eliminate additional violations for a set period of time and to deter people from future violations. We strive to keep restrictions proportionate to the violation they committed.
We may also disable accounts for repeatedly violating our Community Standards or Community Guidelines, despite repeated warnings and restrictions, or for certain very severe violations.
Our standard restrictions may not be proportionate to the violation, or sufficient to reduce the risk of further harm, in the case of public figures posting content during ongoing violence or civil unrest.
Public figures often have broader influence across our platforms; therefore, they may pose a greater risk of harm when they violate our policies. We define public figures as state and national level government officials, political candidates for those offices, people with over one million fans or followers on social media and people who receive substantial news coverage.
When determining the appropriate restriction for a public figure who has violated our policies in ways that incite or celebrate ongoing violent events or civil unrest, we may consider:
The severity of the violation and the public figure’s history on Facebook or Instagram, including current and past violations.
The public figure’s potential influence over, and relationship to, the individuals engaged in violence.
The severity of the violence and any related physical harm.
During times of civil unrest and ongoing violence, we use the above factors to determine the appropriate length of the restriction, ranging from one month to 2 years. For most violations, a public figure will have a one-month restriction from creating content. More serious violations, such as sharing a link to a statement from a terrorist group in the aftermath of an attack, will merit either a 6- or 12-month restriction from creating content. In cases where a violation is severe, we’ll restrict the account for 2 years.
At the end of the restriction period, we’ll look to experts to assess whether the risk to public safety has receded. We’ll evaluate external factors, including instances of violence, restrictions on peaceful assembly and other markers of global or civil unrest. If we determine that there is still a serious risk to public safety, we’ll extend the restriction for a set period of time and continue to re-evaluate until that risk has receded.
When a public figure’s restriction has expired and they regain access to Facebook or Instagram, they will be subject to heightened penalties to deter repeat offenses. While most new violations will trigger a one-month restriction from creating any content, more serious violations will merit a further 2-year restriction. In extreme cases, we will permanently disable their account. As always, we may also disable any account that persistently posts violating content, despite repeated warnings and restrictions.