Policies that outline what is and isn't allowed on the Facebook app.
Policies for ad content and business assets.
Other policies that apply to Meta technologies.
How we update our policies, measure results, work with others and more.
How we help prevent interference, empower people to vote and more.
How we work with independent fact-checkers, and more, to identify and take action on misinformation.
How we assess content for newsworthiness.
How we reduce problematic content in News Feed.
Quarterly report on how well we're doing at enforcing our policies in the Facebook app and on Instagram.
Report on how well we're helping people protect their intellectual property.
Report on government request for people's data.
Report on when we restrict content that's reported to us as violating local law.
Report on intentional Internet restrictions that limit people's ability to access the Internet.
Quarterly report on what people see on Facebook, including the content that receives the widest distribution during the quarter.
Download current and past regulatory reports for Facebook and Instagram.
JAN 20, 2022
There are a number of reasons why Meta may draft a new policy for the Facebook Community Standards and Instagram Community Guidelines or revise an existing one.
Here's how it works:
Meta's Content Policy team, which sits in more than a dozen locations around the world, is responsible for developing our Community Standards and Community Guidelines. The team includes subject matter experts on issues such as hate speech, child safety and terrorism, as well as people with experience in criminal prosecution, rape crisis counselling, academics, human rights, law and education. Many have also worked on issues of voice and safety long before coming to Meta.
The Integrity team assesses the global impact of potential policy changes and builds the technology to scale the detection and enforcement of new policies.
The Global Operations team, whose employees, contractors and outsourcing partners are responsible for enforcing our policies, keep us informed about trends or times when we may need to clarify a policy.
Research teams may also point us to data or user sentiment that seems best addressed through policymaking.
Sometimes, we identify a gap in our policy or an external stakeholder tells us that a policy fails to address an issue that's important to them. In other cases, the press draws attention to a policy gap.