Our approach to newsworthy content

Our newsworthiness allowance

We introduced our newsworthiness allowance in October 2016 after receiving global criticism for removing the iconic “Napalm Girl” photo, which, as a result of this allowance, is visible across our platforms today.

We’ve found that determining the newsworthiness of a piece of content can be highly subjective. People often disagree about what standards should be in place to ensure a community is both safe and open to expression. We conduct a thorough assessment of any potentially newsworthy content and our reviewers consider a number of factors prior to escalating to our Content Policy team.

When making a newsworthy determination, we assess whether that content surfaces an imminent threat to public health or safety, or gives voice to perspectives currently being debated as part of a political process. We also consider other factors, such as:

• Country-specific circumstances (for example, whether there is an election underway, or the country is at war)

• The nature of the speech, including whether it relates to governance or politics

• The political structure of the country, including whether it has a free press

We remove content, even if it has some degree of newsworthiness, when leaving it up presents a risk of harm, such as physical, emotional and financial harm, or a direct threat to public safety. For content we allow that may be sensitive or disturbing, we include a warning screen. In these cases, we can also limit the ability to view the content to adults, ages 18 and older.

Content from all sources, including news outlets, politicians, or other people, is eligible for a newsworthy allowance. While the speaker may factor into the balancing test, we do not presume that any person’s speech is inherently newsworthy, including politicians.

Newsworthy Data

• From June 1, 2021 through June 1, 2022, we documented 68 newsworthiness allowances

• 13 (~20%) of those documented allowances were issued for posts by politicians

Examples

Hate speech present in background of media report on alleged police brutality during protest in Colombia

Media outlets reported an incident of alleged police brutality during the ongoing transport protests in Colombia. The outlets often shared a video where a slur can incidentally be heard in the background, therefore violating our Hate Speech policy. We issued a newsworthy allowance for this video given its public interest value, which outweighed the risk of harm from hearing the incidental use of a slur. However, given that the video also included graphic content, we placed a warning screen over this content and limited its availability to adults ages 18 and older.

Post by Ukrainian Defense Ministry depicting charred bodies

This video originally shared by the Ukrainian Defense Ministry very briefly depicts an unidentified charred body. Though we typically remove this type of content under our Violent and Graphic Content policy, we determined that this video qualified for a newsworthy allowance, as it documented an ongoing armed conflict. We placed a warning screen over this content and limited its availability to adults ages 18 and older because of the graphic nature of the content.

Brazilian politician's post depicting female nipples while discussing government policy towards cinema

The content was posted by a federal deputy in Brazil, and discusses a fire in one of the country’s historic cinemas that destroyed important pieces of Brazilian cinematography. The post criticizes the government for allegedly neglecting the maintenance of the cinema and for a lack of funding for the cinema industry. The post includes a short clip from the movie, Xica da Silva, which depicts uncovered female nipples. A newsworthy allowance was granted as the post discusses the artistic value of the work and contains political speech criticizing the government for not properly funding the cinema, such that the public interest value outweighed the potential for harm.