Policy details

Change log

CHANGE LOG

Change log

Today

Current version

23 Nov 2022
28 Jul 2022
30 Jun 2022
24 Nov 2021
28 Oct 2021
23 Jun 2021
28 Jan 2021
18 Nov 2020
12 Oct 2020
23 Sep 2020
11 Aug 2020
30 Jul 2020
22 Jun 2020
26 Mar 2020
27 Feb 2020
16 Dec 2019
30 Oct 2019
26 Aug 2019
30 Jul 2019
1 Jul 2019
20 Mar 2019
31 Aug 2018
25 May 2018
Show olderShow fewer

Policy rationale

We believe that people use their voice and connect more freely when they don't feel attacked on the basis of who they are. That is why we don't allow hate speech on Facebook. It creates an environment of intimidation and exclusion, and in some cases may promote offline violence.

We define hate speech as a direct attack against people – rather than concepts or institutions – on the basis of what we call protected characteristics: race, ethnicity, national origin, disability, religious affiliation, caste, sexual orientation, sex, gender identity and serious disease. We define attacks as violent or dehumanising speech, harmful stereotypes, statements of inferiority, expressions of contempt, disgust or dismissal, cursing and calls for exclusion or segregation. We also prohibit the use of harmful stereotypes, which we define as dehumanising comparisons that have historically been used to attack, intimidate or exclude specific groups, and that are often linked with offline violence. We consider age a protected characteristic when referenced along with another protected characteristic. We also protect refugees, migrants, immigrants and asylum seekers from the most severe attacks, though we do allow commentary and criticism of immigration policies. Similarly, we provide some protections for characteristics such as occupation, when they're referenced along with a protected characteristic. Sometimes, based on local nuance, we consider certain words or phrases as frequently used proxies for PC groups.

We also prohibit the usage of slurs that are used to attack people on the basis of their protected characteristics. However, we recognise that people sometimes share content that includes slurs or someone else's hate speech to condemn it or raise awareness. In other cases, speech, including slurs, that might otherwise violate our standards can be used self-referentially or in an empowering way. Our policies are designed to allow room for these types of speech, but we require people to clearly indicate their intent. If the intention is unclear, we may remove content.

Learn more about our approach to hate speech.

Do not post:

Tier 1

Content targeting a person or group of people (including all groups except those who are considered non-protected groups described as having carried out violent crimes or sexual offences or representing less than half of a group) on the basis of their aforementioned protected characteristic(s) or immigration status with:

  • Violent speech or support in written or visual form
  • Dehumanising speech or imagery in the form of comparisons, generalisations or unqualified behavioural statements (in written or visual form) to or about:
    • Insects (including but not limited to: cockroaches, locusts)
    • Animals in general or specific types of animals that are culturally perceived as intellectually or physically inferior (including but not limited to: Black people and apes or ape-like creatures; Jewish people and rats; Muslim people and pigs; Mexican people and worms)
    • Filth (including but not limited to: dirt, grime)
    • Bacteria, viruses or microbes
    • Disease (including but not limited to: cancer, sexually transmitted diseases)
    • Faeces (including but not limited to: shit, crap)
    • Subhumanity (including but not limited to: savages, devils, monsters, primitives)
    • Sexual predators (including but not limited to: Muslim people having sex with goats or pigs)
    • Violent criminals (including but not limited to: terrorists, murderers, members of hate or criminal organisations)
    • Other criminals (including, but not limited to, "thieves", "bank robbers" or saying "All [protected characteristic or quasi-protected characteristic] are 'criminals'").
    • Certain objects (women as household objects, property or objects in general; Black people as farm equipment; transgender or non-binary people as "it")
    • Statements denying existence (including but not limited to: "[protected characteristic(s) or quasi-protected characteristic] do not exist", "no such thing as [protected charactic(s) or quasi-protected characteristic]")
    • Harmful stereotypes historically linked to intimidation, exclusion or violence on the basis of a protected characteristic, such as Blackface; Holocaust denial; claims that Jewish people control financial, political or media institutions; and references to Dalits as menial labourers
  • Mocking the concept, events or victims of hate crimes even if no real person is depicted in an image.

Tier 2

Content targeting a person or group of people on the basis of their protected characteristic(s) with:

  • Generalisations that state inferiority (in written or visual form) in the following ways:
    • Physical deficiencies are defined as those about:
      • Hygiene, including, but not limited to: filthy, dirty, smelly.
      • Physical appearance, including, but not limited to: ugly, hideous.
    • Mental deficiencies are defined as those about:
      • Intellectual capacity, including, but not limited to: dumb, stupid, idiots.
      • Education, including, but not limited to: illiterate, uneducated.
      • Mental health, including, but not limited to: mentally ill, retarded, crazy, insane.
    • Moral deficiencies are defined as those about:
      • Character traits culturally perceived as negative, including, but not limited to: coward, liar, arrogant, ignorant.
      • Derogatory terms related to sexual activity, including, but not limited to: whore, slut, perverts.
  • Other statements of inferiority, which we define as:
    • Expressions about being less than adequate, including, but not limited to: worthless, useless.
    • Expressions about being better/worse than another protected characteristic, including, but not limited to: "I believe that males are superior to females."
    • Expressions about deviating from the norm, including, but not limited to: freaks, abnormal.
  • Expressions of contempt (in written or visual form), which we define as:
    • Self-admission to intolerance on the basis of protected characteristics, including, but not limited to: homophobic, islamophobic, racist.
    • Expressions that a protected characteristic shouldn't exist.
    • Expressions of hate, including, but not limited to: despise, hate.
  • Expressions of dismissal, including, but not limited to: don't respect, don't like, don't care for
  • Expressions of disgust (in written or visual form), which we define as:
    • Expressions suggesting that the target causes sickness, including, but not limited to: vomit, throw up.
    • Expressions of repulsion or distaste, including, but not limited to: vile, disgusting, yuck.
  • Cursing, except certain gender-based cursing in a romantic break-up context, defined as:
    • Referring to the target as genitalia or anus, including, but not limited to: cunt, dick, asshole.
    • Profane terms or phrases with the intent to insult, including, but not limited to: fuck, bitch, motherfucker.
    • Terms or phrases calling for engagement in sexual activity, or contact with genitalia, anus, faeces or urine, including, but not limited to: suck my dick, kiss my ass, eat shit.

Tier 3

Content targeting a person or group of people on the basis of their protected characteristic(s) with any of the following:

  • Segregation in the form of calls for action, statements of intent, aspirational or conditional statements, or statements advocating or supporting segregation.
  • Exclusion in the form of calls for action, statements of intent, aspirational or conditional statements, or statements advocating or supporting, defined as
    • Explicit exclusion, which means things such as expelling certain groups or saying they are not allowed.
    • Political exclusion, which means denying the right to political participation.
    • Economic exclusion, which means denying access to economic entitlements and limiting participation in the labour market.
    • Social exclusion, which means things such as denying access to spaces (physical and online) and social services, except for gender-based exclusion in health and positive support groups.

Content that describes or negatively targets people with slurs, where slurs are defined as words that are inherently offensive and used as insulting labels for the above characteristics.

For the following Community Standards, we require additional information and/or context to enforce:

Do not post:

  • Content explicitly providing or offering to provide products or services that aim to change people's sexual orientation or gender identity.
  • Content attacking concepts, institutions, ideas, practices or beliefs associated with protected characteristics, which are likely to contribute to imminent physical harm, intimidation or discrimination against the people associated with that protected characteristic. Facebook looks at a range of signs to determine whether there is a threat of harm in the content. These include, but are not limited to: content that could incite imminent violence or intimidation; whether there is a period of heightened tension such as an election or ongoing conflict; and whether there is a recent history of violence against the targeted protected group. In some cases, we may also consider whether the speaker is a public figure or occupies a position of authority.
  • Content targeting a person or group of people on the basis of their protected characteristic(s) with claims that they have or spread the novel coronavirus, are responsible for the existence of the novel coronavirus or are deliberately spreading the novel coronavirus, or mocking them for having or experiencing the novel coronavirus.

In certain cases, we will allow content that may otherwise violate the Community Standards when it is determined that the content is satirical. Content will only be allowed if the violating elements of the content are being satirised or attributed to something or someone else in order to mock or criticise them.

User experiences

See some examples of what enforcement looks like for people on Facebook, such as: what it looks like to report something that you don't think should be on Facebook, to be told that you've violated our Community Standards and to see a warning screen over certain content.

Note: We're always improving, so what you see here may be slightly outdated compared to what we currently use.

Data
Prevalence

Percentage of times that people saw violating content

Content actioned

Number of pieces of violating content that we took action on

Proactive rate

Percentage of violating content that we found before people reported it

Appealed content

Number of pieces of content that people appealed after we took action on it

Restored content

Number of pieces of content that we restored after we originally took action on it

Prevalence

Percentage of times that people saw violating content

Content actioned

Number of pieces of violating content that we took action on

Proactive rate

Percentage of violating content that we found before people reported it

Appealed content

Number of pieces of content that people appealed after we took action on it

Restored content

Number of pieces of content that we restored after we originally took action on it

Reporting
1
Universal entry point

We have an option to report, whether it's on a post, a comment, a story, a message or something else.

2
Getting started

We help people report things that they don't think should be on our platform.

3
Select a problem

We ask people to tell us more about what's wrong. This helps us send the report to the right place.

4
Report submitted

After these steps, we submit the report. We also lay out what people should expect next.

Post-report communication
1
Update via notifications

After we've reviewed the report, we'll send the reporting user a notification.

2
More detail in the Support Inbox

We'll share more details about our review decision in the Support Inbox. We'll notify people that this information is there and send them a link to it.

3
Appeal option

If people think we made the wrong decision, they can request another review.

4
Post-appeal communication

We'll send a final response after we've re-reviewed the content, again to the Support Inbox.

Takedown experience
1
Immediate notification

When someone posts something that violates our Community Standards, we'll tell them.

2
Additional context

We'll also address common misperceptions around enforcement.

3
Explain the policy

We'll give people easy-to-understand explanations about why their content was removed.

4
Ask for input

After we've established the context for our decision and explained our policy, we'll ask people what they'd like to do next, including letting us know if they think we made a mistake.

5
Tell us more

If people disagree with the decision, we'll ask them to tell us more.

6
Set expectations

Here, we set expectations on what will happen next.

Warning screens
1
Warning screens in context

We cover certain content in News Feed and other surfaces, so people can choose whether to see it.

2
More information

In this example, we give more context on why we've covered the photo with more context from independent fact-checkers

Enforcement

We have the same policies around the world, for everyone on Facebook.

Review teams

Our global team of over 15,000 reviewers work every day to keep people on Facebook safe.

Stakeholder engagement

Outside experts, academics, NGOs and policymakers help inform the Facebook Community Standards.

Get help with hate speech

Learn what you can do if you see something on Facebook that goes against our Community Standards.