Policies that outline what is and isn't allowed on the Facebook app.
Policies for ad content and business assets.
Other policies that apply to Meta technologies.
How we update our policies, measure results, work with others and more.
How we help prevent interference, empower people to vote and more.
How we work with independent fact-checkers, and more, to identify and take action on misinformation.
How we assess content for newsworthiness.
How we reduce problematic content in News Feed.
Quarterly report on how well we're doing at enforcing our policies in the Facebook app and on Instagram.
Report on how well we're helping people protect their intellectual property.
Report on government request for people's data.
Report on when we restrict content that's reported to us as violating local law.
Report on intentional Internet restrictions that limit people's ability to access the Internet.
Quarterly report on what people see on Facebook, including the content that receives the widest distribution during the quarter.
Download current and past regulatory reports for Facebook and Instagram.
JAN 19, 2022
Review teams base their decisions on the detailed policies set out in the Facebook Community Standards and Instagram Community Guidelines. In theory, two reviewers reviewing the same posts would always make the same decision, but judgements can also vary if policies are not sufficiently prescriptive.
This is why Meta strives to make our policies as clear and comprehensive as possible. To help with this, a sample of reviewer decisions are audited on a regular basis to ensure that we're consistently applying our policies or identifying areas where there may be policy gaps. We've also implemented a tool, which is designed to facilitate feedback from reviewers on policy, tooling and other improvement ideas.
In order for our reviewers to apply our policies accurately, they must also focus on their resilience and well-being. Here are some support resources available to them:
Review teams working with content that may be objectionable and/or graphic have access to resilience programmes. Our team of clinical psychologists consult with our vendor partners, and with our vendor-partner's own well-being teams, to offer an overall strategic framework and ensure that these resilience programmes are industry-leading.
In the review tool, we built a suite of well-being options designed to help reviewers, which include the ability to mute videos and blur images or have them appear in black and white.
Reviewers have access to mental health resources, including trained, onsite professionals offering individual and group support sessions. Reviewers also have access to a 24-hour emergency support line.
We know that reviewers deal with a number of serious issues, so we work with some of the best partners in the industry to ensure that their work environment is supportive and conducive to their well-being.
Content review can be challenging work. Keeping people safe online sometimes means review teams have to look at content that may be objectionable or graphic. We respect the difficulty of this work and want to make sure that reviewers have access to all the resources they need to do their job and safeguard their health.